« Care2's Community Impacts Global Change | Main | Webinar Recap: Connecting Advocacy to Fundraising »
Sunday
31Jan2010

Nonprofit Social Media Benchmarks Study

Interested in setting Facebook and Twitter benchmarks for your nonprofit but don’t know where to start? Check out M+R Strategic Services first Nonprofit Social Media Benchmarks Study, which includes sample research by groups such as Easter Seals, Oxfam, Human Rights Campaign, League of Conservation Voters, and more.

Facebook Key Findings:               

  • Organizations posted to their Facebook Pages about six times weekly.
  • 2.5% of each organization's Facebook fans took some sort of an action weekly such as contributing wall posts, "likes," or comments.
  • Generating a high fan rate is important, since news feeds carry that activity to potential new fans.
  • Facebook fans grew by 3.75% monthly. However, it’s important to note that 2% of Facebook fans either removed themselves or chose to hide the news feed monthly.
  • The overall fan churn rate is 24% per year, which is higher than the eNonprofit Benchmarks Study email churn rate of 19% per year.

Facebook Recommendations

  • M+R recommends that nonprofits find their Facebook fans' "sweet spot" between too many and too few posts.
  • Measure your organizations stats and engagement now and focus on improving those results over time.
  • Engage and provide interesting and useful info to your fans.

Be sure and also check out Frogloop’s "Five Tips to Ramp Up Your Nonprofits Fan Page."

Twitter Key Findings

  • Organizations tweeted four to five times daily.
  • Twitter followers grew by 9% monthly, much higher than average monthly growth on both Facebook fan pages at 3.75% and nonprofit email lists at 1.4%.
  • The more nonprofits were active on Twitter and tweeted, the more their followers retweeted their tweets which helped grow their Twitter following.

Twitter Recommendations:

While M+R did not provide a section on Twitter recommendations here are a couple of Frogloop's key suggestions to build up your organizations presence on Twitter.

Quality over Quantity

Don’t focus on getting millions of followers who may or may not care about your issue, but rather on people who are interested in the issues your organization is working on. In November 2009, Frogloop reported on a simple click-through rate test on a tweet and link that Beth Kanter sent out to her 120,000+ followers and Geoff Livingston sent to his 7500+ followers. The results? Beth’s link generated a 0.2% CTR and Geoff’s generated .7% CTR. Why?  “Generally speaking, with more casual followers you lose engagement and influence power,” said Livingston.

Talk With Me Not At Me

Use Twitter to connect with your supporters and potential members. Don’t just tweet links to new articles, factsheets and call it a day. Twitter should be used as a two-way communication. Ask followers for their opinions on campaigns your organization is working on. Respond to their tweets. Counter the opposition publicizing bad information. Be social!

Also check out Frogloop’s post on The Art of Getting Retweeted.



You should follow Frogloop on Twitter.

Receive monthly updates

Reader Comments (8)

I think @SocialCitizen experienced the same kind of click through rates as Beth. Nevertheless with the sheer mass of their accounts, great friends to have, so to speak. Good post, Allyson. Thanks for sharing these #s.
January 31, 2010 | Unregistered CommenterGeoff Livingston
Thanks for this, Allyson. Great info. Is there anything in the study about click-thrus from Facebook?
February 1, 2010 | Unregistered CommenterLeif Utne
The study reported on pageviews. For every post by an organization, 0.56% of that organization's fans viewed the Page. But fan actions are much more important which was about 2.5% weekly.
February 1, 2010 | Unregistered CommenterAllyson Kapin
In some ways, I thought this missed the mark a bit ... could have drawn some metrics from other studies that have analyzed bigger samples, although not nonprofits.
February 2, 2010 | Unregistered CommenterBeth Kanter
I think you raise some fair points Beth. But is comparing nonprofits to studies that rely on big corporations data and who also have more money and staff to devote to their social media, the best comparison? Nonetheless, I would love to see a study that compares the two sectors and if there are distinct differences in the data, it would be great to dig in as to why. Resources, bigger known brands, etc.
February 2, 2010 | Unregistered CommenterAllyson Kapin
Hey, great post! One concern though. Actually more just something I'm pondering. I wonder about the utility of talking about benchmarks, levels of activities, divorced from intended outcomes or results. Does it matter what you want to have happen out there - deepened relationship, growing network, crowdsourcing that then determines what the benchmarks should be? Just wondering. Thanks!
February 4, 2010 | Unregistered CommenterAllison Fine
Good post. It's good to see some benchmarks being established for non-profits to compare.

Click thrus, friends and followers are important metrics to track. But I think we in the non-profit marketing world need to keep these metrics in context with opportunity costs.

Given the pressure on resources, staff time and marketing budgets, ROI has to be part of this conversation.

What are the metrics for converting friends and followers to advocates and donors.

How do posts and tweets compare to direct mail acquisition rates, online and print advocacy campaigns, etc?
February 5, 2010 | Unregistered CommenterMartin Smith
A most compelling article. Nicely done. I am the founding President of Ve'ahavta (www.veahavta.org) and commend you for your blog. Take a look at a recent article I wrote on launching a non-profit at http://avrum.net

Take care, Avrum

avrum@veahavta.org
March 15, 2010 | Unregistered CommenterAvrum Rosensweig

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
All HTML will be escaped. Hyperlinks will be created for URLs automatically.