« Why Every Nonprofit Should Embrace the Web 2.0 World | Main | Nonprofit Resolutions That Will Make A Difference in 2009 »
Wednesday
Feb042009

The Joys of Google Grants, Part 2

In part one of this series, I discussed the first steps the National Women’s Law Center took when we initially received our Google Grant, and some of the challenges we faced getting started. Today, I’ll go into more detail on how we’ve maximized the use of our grant, and some of the benefits we’ve seen from it.

Refining the Process

Figuring Out What Works

Over the first few months of our grant, we continued to experiment with our ads and keywords, and to monitor how each of our campaigns was performing. Of the ten issue-based campaigns we started out with, we noticed that two of them ― the ones focused on child care assistance and child support enforcement ― were outperforming the others. They were maxing out their allocated daily budgets of around $30. So we directed more of our budget to those campaigns.

We also held more brainstorming sessions on those issues and added new keywords that came out of those sessions. For example, when we brainstormed for additional keywords for our women and poverty campaign, we added terms like “poverty level” and “poverty line” to our existing collection of keywords (“low income women,” “poverty in america,” etc.) — and now those are getting among the highest impression counts of all our poverty-related keywords. And for our general women’s rights campaign, we added new phrases using the words “equal” and “fair” in broad match combinations we might not have thought of originally, like “women fair” and “equality women.” We’re seeing high impressions on those, too.

Lo and behold, the campaigns started maxing out on their new, increased budgets. Over the next few weeks, we moved more and more of our budget into those two campaigns, as well as a few others that were also showing above-average performance. Soon, we were coming very close to using our overall daily budget of $330 every weekday. Weekends and holidays were always lower, and, much to our chagrin, Google won’t allow us to move any of our daily budget from weekends to weekdays. It’s $330 a day, every day, period. (Grr.) So we tried moving more of our budget into certain campaigns on the weekends, then moving it back on weekdays — and that helped, too.

Making the Most of the News Cycle

In September 2008, NWLC launched a voter education microsite that included a register-to-vote widget, and we started running Google ads on keywords like “register to vote.” Visitors who clicked on the ads were encouraged to complete the voter registration form on our site, sign our Pledge to Vote form, and check out our educational resources on women and voting.

Surprise, surprise, a lot of people were searching on keywords like “register to vote” in September and October, and we got our highest numbers yet. So we moved a lot of our budget into those ads

During the pre-election season, this was the ad that performed best for us:

Now that the election is over, we’ve moved most of our budget back to our standard programmatic ad campaigns. But we’re continuing to add new campaigns when our issues are in the news. For example, when NWLC’s Vice President for Health and Reproductive Rights, Judy Waxman, was interviewed on MSNBC in a story about the failings of the individual health insurance market when it comes to women, we ran special ads on keywords we thought people might search for after watching the piece.

Back to Basics


We’re still keeping a close eye on the performance of our campaigns, and experimenting with new topics, ads, and keywords.

These are our best-performing “evergreen” ads — the ones that aren’t tied to a specific timely topic:

(A note on that last one ― yes, we do run ads using our organization’s name, and its common misspellings, as keywords. Although sadly our unabbreviated name is too long to fit the 25-character limit on ad headlines.)

The Payoff

In October, at the height of the election season, we managed to go over our Google Grants budget, spending $10,212 and earning a click-through rate of 6.43% and a conversion rate of 2.10%. By November, when things had gotten back down to semi-normal, we spent $9,108.57 and had a CTR was 2.17% and a conversion rate of 4.40%.

Other Benefits

We’ve been pleasantly surprised by the additional, less quantifiable uses we’re finding for our Google Grant. For example, NWLC’s website is undergoing a redesign, but right now, our site isn’t very well optimized for search engines. However, our Google ads offer us a way around that. People who are searching for issues that we work on might not find our website in their first page of organic search results, but they may well see one of our Google ads. Then, they might click through, sign up to join our e-mail list, and spend time exploring our site, using our resources, and getting to know the organization. They might even make a donation or two.

We’ve also found that the ads are a great way to test new messaging. We’ll create three or more ad variations for each campaign, and Google will tell us which version got the most clicks. These results can help us determine what messaging to use in our other communications. For example, we discovered early on that “Find out if your birth control is covered by your insurance” generated more clicks than “Does your health insurance plan include contraception?”

Looking Ahead

When we were first starting out, our goal was to use as much of our budget as we could. Now, our goal is to increase our conversions — the number of people who click on an ad and then sign up to join our e-mail list, or download a free resource, or take another action. We’re paying close attention to how we set up our landing pages, conscious of the fact that people searching for information on low-income families in the United States might have different expectations from our website than people searching for information on the history of NWLC.

We’ll keep refining our ads and keywords, and we’ll keep following the latest news and tips from the Google Grants blog. And we’ll keep trying new things and seeing what works. Without a doubt, that’s the best advice I can give to anyone working with Google Grants — experiment, experiment, experiment.

Have you experimented with Google AdWords? What tips do you have for optimizing your Google Grant?

*This article was written by Robin Reed, Online Outreach Manager for the National Women's Law Center.

Never miss a post by subscribing to frogloop's RSS feed.

Receive monthly updates

Reader Comments (7)

Robin,

Yet another great article! Even for organizations that don't qualify for Google Grants, this information's extremely valuable.

What kinds of statistics did you track to estimate the effectiveness of the ads?

jon
February 5, 2009 | Unregistered Commenterjon
This and the earlier companion piece are great articles.

A few other things we also advise our clients:

1) Maybe what you are organizing as a campaign should really be an AdGroup. If you do want to allocate different budget amounts, you should stick to campaigns. Similarly, if you are using different geo-targeting, negative keywords that cross only some topics, or limited timeframes, you should stick to Campaigns. If you are only grouping by topic, AdGroup organization is generally the way to go.

2) Pay attention to quality scores. The quality score column is not shown by default when looking at your keyword lists. By improving quality scores over time, you will get lower keyword costs and better rankings. This will also help bring some of the those minimums above $1 back down.

3) One of the best ways to build quality score is by bidding on brand terms.

4) once your account gets built out, it is often more efficient to manage it using the downloadable Google AdWords editor - http://www.google.com/intl/en/adwordseditor/.
February 5, 2009 | Unregistered CommenterDaniel Schulman
Thanks jon! Conversion rates are definitely the key stat for us, but we keep an eye on CTR too.
February 6, 2009 | Unregistered CommenterRobin Reed
Thanks Daniel. Actually, I stopped using the AdWords Editor after a few weeks. When entering more than one keyword at a time I found the web interface much easier to work with than the AdWords Editor.
February 6, 2009 | Unregistered CommenterRobin Reed
True, the web interface is generally better for adding keywords - especially if you are using Google's Keyword Tool.

However, adding keywords is only one aspect of AdWords management. For many tasks such as reorganizing your Campaigns into AdGroups the AdWords Editor is invaluable.
February 17, 2009 | Unregistered CommenterDaniel Schulman
Out of curiosity-- has anyone else gotten cancellation notices from google? We've had a grant for about 9 months- and in much the same way described here, quickly found we could hit our budget limit every month-- we were getting excellent conversions and CTR's.

Though we'd been told by someone who at Google who helped us set the account up that is was likely to go forever, we just got a note that the funding will be turned off next week-- with no one willing to answer follow-up questions.

Has this happened to anyone else??
March 9, 2009 | Unregistered CommenterAbigail Hirsch
Great articles on optimizing Google Grant accounts! We have had great success creating landing pages that offer something for 'free' so that we can include the word 'free' in our client's campaigns. Free ecards for the holidays, free information about the topic you are targeting with keywords (e.g. "Free Breast Cancer checklist" leading to a landing page with an email contact form that automatically delivers the 'free' PDF)

The reason this helps with AdWords is that ads with "free" in the title/body tend to get a higher click through rate over time. The higher the CTR, the lower the bid price hurdle. It can bring slightly out of reach keywords under the $1.00 mark. Google also rewards high CTR ads with more frequent saturation on search result pages.

Great article! Update?

John
the-internet-people.com
January 22, 2012 | Unregistered CommenterJohn Sanchez

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
All HTML will be escaped. Hyperlinks will be created for URLs automatically.