Is your Nonprofit too Social Media Dependent?
Monday, November 9, 2009 at 06:16PM | by
Allyson Kapin
What would happen to your nonprofit’s outreach work if Facebook or Twitter shut down? Since you don’t own the data, you wouldn’t be able to salvage it. With all the buzz of the Web 2.0 world and nonprofit’s wanting to carve out their space in it, it’s important that we:
1) Spend some time (not all of it) capturing people’s basic contact information (name, state, and email address at the very least) as part of your social networking strategy. You can do this via petitions, fundraising appeals, polls, etc. Currently I don’t know of any append companies that provide this service. If you do, please let me know in the comments section.
2) Not place all of our eggs in one basket or in this case one popular social network.
I often tell clients and readers on Frogloop, that it’s important to be where your audiences are which includes social networks like Facebook and Twitter. While I still stand behind this statement, it’s just as important to recognize that businesses (no matter how cool and popular) come and go and we must be prepared for those “what if” moments.
Just last week, MySpace eliminated Causes, the peer-to-peer fundraising service that started on Facebook. An estimated 184,000 people used Causes on MySpace and now it’s gone. Of course, compared to the 35 million users on Facebook, this does not seem significant on the face of it, but it is. Here’s why. Right now, the largest social networks are built on proprietary platforms VS open source platforms.
“It's frankly terrifying that we're handing over almost all of our microblogging content and networking interactions to a single company (Twitter), said Sean Larkin of ThinkShout.com. There is an open standard for microblogging. There are many distributed, open-source microblogging services (like identi.ca) through which we could be routing our "tweets" - while still leveraging all of Twitter's goodness. The difference would be that we'd still own our own microblogging data. As with email, we could still talk to each other via tweets - but we'd have more choices in terms of vendors, dedicated hosting options, etc.”
Beth Kanter, social media trainer and blogger, has been focusing on capturing her users’ data in the event Twitter or Facebook suddenly disappeared.
“One thing I was initially doing was grabbing names into spreadsheets. For Facebook I would input the data in manually, but I could do it automatically with other apps w/Twitter. Then I would dump the data into a Social CRM (contact info w/Twitter handles and updates). But when my followers ballooned, it got impossible,” said Kanter. “Then I realized, I don't need to capture all of them - just the influencers across different communities. So, now I've been focusing on keeping a spreadsheet of these influencers across different communities - and using social network analysis to analyze that. With that said, it takes time to do this - but it is an important part of the documentation process -- as well as documenting lessons learned.”
Is the Portable Social Graph One Solution?
Besides building your own social network where you would own your own data, the Portable Social Graph could be another solution. Michelle Murrain and Kanter wrote about this several months ago. “The "social graph" is, basically, your data about who you are, and who is connected to you - who your friends are. A portable social graph would be one that you can take with you, wherever you are - so the friends that are connected with you on one network are also connected with you on another. It's the holy grail of social network connectivity - you are connected to who you are connected to, no matter what site you are on”, said Murrain.
While popular social networks like Facebook and Twitter are not currently in danger of going out of business, the importance of collecting basic user data (aka list building) is still something to consider when planning your social media outreach strategy.
You should follow Frogloop on Twitter.
9 Comments | by 




Reader Comments (9)
The way I view applications like Twitter and Facebook is that what they facilitate is more important than what they are. If the application itself went away it would like taking your fist out of a bucket of water, it would be replaced by something else overnight.
The scary issue for me would be if the facility went away altogether - like, for some reason, the two way open free speech nature of the internet itself went away. That would be frightening.
I rely on a the Salesforce CRM for all our company critical information - when people become leads or sales - there are many open source inexpensive and/or free alternatives. I don't keep any backup or record of friend's or followers...should I?
Great article. I'd love to hear from your readers about other platforms that try to solve this problem.
Anyway, is the question are we too dependent on social media or are we too dependent on platforms (that we don't control or aren't open)? Probably the latter. But for most groups building your own social network doesn't make sense even if it were technically/financially feasible. Where is the discussion about open social network platforms that can be shared across/among groups? Must be some of that going on. Where Change.org (or Care2) fit into this?
The point about identi.ca is interesting. Are there other pointers like this for those that might want to try to use more open approaches/better collect data even if still relying on these proprietary networks?
@ted - Elgg is open source and allows users to build their own social network, but like you said building your own is not the right fit for many organizations. There are some others like Pligg (has some Digg features) and Scuttle (similar to delicious) but they are not nearly as popular - which is part of the problem.
When I posted about the Causes event last week, I wish I had thought of some of the questions you raise here to add to the others I posed! Especially the "too social media dependent" perspective. The Causes event made me think of the people behind the technologies, the technologies themselves, and then the relationships between that side of things and the end users. As is being discussed in the comments there, it's a difficult line between "going where your community is" and ensuring that you are in a place where you have access to data, relationships, etc.
I appreciate Beth's personal case study, but don't necessarily agree that it would work for an organization, not just an individual. Only capturing "influencers" sounds like a subjective process and one difficult to pass on to others in the organization or to a new employee taking over for the previous staffer in charge. Also, it's been my experience working in nonprofits that it's far more important to be able to track, monitor, and even simply count all of your supporters (whether they are donors, volunteers, advocates or anything else), than to only mention the influential folks.
Thanks so much for the post and continuing to discuss the issues!
(post at: http://www.amysampleward.org/2009/11/06/new-on-ssir-letting-technology-lead/)
The key is to find a balance by using channels suited to you donor profiles, as you have indicated. My experience is that high-end donors, for example, are not highly-engaged online. Go where your donors go.
There are several ways to capture email sign-up from Social Networks and these can be customized as a means of collecting data. Facebook, for example, has a widget. I'm certain this could be locked into other networks, including MySpace. I have used this widget in conjunction with forms created in Exact Target and the data can easily be exported for use in a CRM tool such as MS-CRM. From time to time, it's necessary to cross-reference your fans/members with the CRM data, but with a little disciplin, it can be accomplished.
Regarding high dollar donors. It's important that nonprofit's engage all levels of donors - small dollar donors who are committed to nonprofit's missions and donate repeatedly are just as important as high dollar donors. Also, small dollar donors can be moved up the chain to eventually donate more.