« What's an Email Address Worth? Just Calculate it! | Main | On Frogloop's Radar »
Monday
09Nov2009

Is your Nonprofit too Social Media Dependent?

What would happen to your nonprofit’s outreach work if Facebook or Twitter shut down? Since you don’t own the data, you wouldn’t be able to salvage it.  With all the buzz of the Web 2.0 world and nonprofit’s wanting to carve out their space in it, it’s important that we:

1)    Spend some time (not all of it) capturing people’s basic contact information (name, state, and email address at the very least) as part of your social networking strategy. You can do this via petitions, fundraising appeals, polls, etc. Currently I don’t know of any append companies that provide this service. If you do, please let me know in the comments section.

2)    Not place all of our eggs in one basket or in this case one popular social network.

I often tell clients and readers on Frogloop, that it’s important to be where your audiences are which includes social networks like Facebook and Twitter. While I still stand behind this statement, it’s just as important to recognize that businesses (no matter how cool and popular) come and go and we must be prepared for those “what if” moments.  

Just last week, MySpace eliminated Causes, the peer-to-peer fundraising service that started on Facebook.  An estimated 184,000 people used Causes on MySpace and now it’s gone. Of course, compared to the 35 million users on Facebook, this does not seem significant on the face of it, but it is. Here’s why. Right now, the largest social networks are built on proprietary platforms VS open source platforms.

“It's frankly terrifying that we're handing over almost all of our microblogging content and networking interactions to a single company (Twitter), said Sean Larkin of ThinkShout.com. There is an open standard for microblogging. There are many distributed, open-source microblogging services (like identi.ca) through which we could be routing our "tweets" - while still leveraging all of Twitter's goodness. The difference would be that we'd still own our own microblogging data. As with email, we could still talk to each other via tweets - but we'd have more choices in terms of vendors, dedicated hosting options, etc.”

Beth Kanter, social media trainer and blogger, has been focusing on capturing her users’ data in the event Twitter or Facebook suddenly disappeared.

“One thing I was initially doing was grabbing names into spreadsheets. For Facebook I would input the data in manually, but I could do it automatically with other apps w/Twitter. Then I would dump the data into a Social CRM (contact info w/Twitter handles and updates). But when my followers ballooned, it got impossible,” said Kanter.  “Then I realized, I don't need to capture all of them - just the influencers across different communities.  So, now I've been focusing on keeping a spreadsheet of these influencers across different communities - and using social network analysis to analyze that. With that said, it takes time to do this - but it is an important part of the documentation process -- as well as documenting lessons learned.”

Is the Portable Social Graph One Solution?

Besides building your own social network where you would own your own data, the Portable Social Graph could be another solution. Michelle Murrain and Kanter wrote about this several months ago. “The "social graph" is, basically, your data about who you are, and who is connected to you - who your friends are. A portable social graph would be one that you can take with you, wherever you are - so the friends that are connected with you on one network are also connected with you on another. It's the holy grail of social network connectivity - you are connected to who you are connected to, no matter what site you are on”, said Murrain.

While popular social networks like Facebook and Twitter are not currently in danger of going out of business, the importance of collecting basic user data (aka list building) is still something to consider when planning your social media outreach strategy.

You should follow Frogloop on Twitter.

Receive monthly updates

 

Reader Comments (9)

I would never advocate relying on any of these applications for company critical data, our business sure doesn't.
The way I view applications like Twitter and Facebook is that what they facilitate is more important than what they are. If the application itself went away it would like taking your fist out of a bucket of water, it would be replaced by something else overnight.
The scary issue for me would be if the facility went away altogether - like, for some reason, the two way open free speech nature of the internet itself went away. That would be frightening.
I rely on a the Salesforce CRM for all our company critical information - when people become leads or sales - there are many open source inexpensive and/or free alternatives. I don't keep any backup or record of friend's or followers...should I?
November 9, 2009 | Unregistered CommenterDamian Saunders
I'm hoping your readers come up with some good suggestions about how to approach this - I don't think I have it figured out at all.
November 9, 2009 | Unregistered CommenterBeth Kanter
Great article. Speaks to the need for distribution vs destination problem. In your pitfall cases, people fixate on social media destinations to much instead of seeing the opportunity to distribute using the natural tendency for these networks to propagate your message, if it is a good one, across *all* platforms naturally. There are distribution platforms that help you do this, most notably, the one I just left Google for: www.Brickfish.com/company. It is an interesting solution to the destination problem. If you set up a campaign to distribute your message virally with the right motivation, your audience posts your message for you on "all" relevant social sites without over-investing in one. Then you can easily identify influencers by how well they bring in engagement not just on single individual social sites, but across the social landscape more than 1000 social sites. And you can see nearly all content site-hops. One person posts an entry to FB, which brought in 150 people from FB AND in-turn was posted on MySpace, Twitter, and Xanga to the tune of 20,000 more people. THIS person is an influencer not just for his own 1st level of connections, but the viral nature of that extending out for an average of 150 people per unique engager. Powerful stuff. What I'd like to see is this platform and others like it become the new-world "crm", where it is not email addresses you are after, but engagement and finding those people where they really talk about your brand. What is more valuable, an email list of people who either directly or inadvertently signed up for a newsletter or people who created, commented on, posted, and reposted content about your brand.

Great article. I'd love to hear from your readers about other platforms that try to solve this problem.
November 10, 2009 | Unregistered CommenterPaul
Thanks for writing this. I'm less concerned about Twitter than Facebook... perhaps b/c it is so much more ephemeral by nature - one doesn't necessarily give Twitter a ton of personal info (which can be used by orgs). It is a basic communications device that is used as a social network but isn't really one.

Anyway, is the question are we too dependent on social media or are we too dependent on platforms (that we don't control or aren't open)? Probably the latter. But for most groups building your own social network doesn't make sense even if it were technically/financially feasible. Where is the discussion about open social network platforms that can be shared across/among groups? Must be some of that going on. Where Change.org (or Care2) fit into this?

The point about identi.ca is interesting. Are there other pointers like this for those that might want to try to use more open approaches/better collect data even if still relying on these proprietary networks?
November 10, 2009 | Unregistered CommenterTed Fickes
I really like how you touched upon trying to figure out best methods for collecting your friends' and followers' information. We (Idealware) initially considered manually going through Facebook fans to check against our current constituents, but ultimately I had a hard time prioritizing that. Similarly to using surveys or petitions like you suggested, I think giving people a reason to go from Twitter/Facebook/etc. to your website to take some sort of action could be a good way to capture their information. However, it is important to think about why you are using social media to begin with (have a goal!), and collecting people's information may not be crucial to meeting and tracking that goal. Thanks for a thought-provoking post!
November 10, 2009 | Unregistered CommenterKaitlin LaCasse
Thanks for the great feedback. Social networks are a great way to brand your nonprofit and engage new and existing supporters by having social conversations around your nonprofit's advocacy issues. However, it's important to connect your nonprofit's mission and outreach goals to social media outreach. For example, is your nonprofit's ultimate goal to pass legislation? Chances are you will need supporters to write letters, sign a petition, call their Members of Congress, etc. Or perhaps your organization relies on supporters to donate money to fund key programs and initiatives. This takes people - a lot of people that we need to move up the ladder of activism. We need to be careful not to fall prey to shiny object syndrome and not to treat social media as another silo. Nonprofit's often don't tie goals, objectives, and benchmarks to their social media outreach such as capturing our communities contact info. This needs to change so we can help move them up that ladder.

@ted - Elgg is open source and allows users to build their own social network, but like you said building your own is not the right fit for many organizations. There are some others like Pligg (has some Digg features) and Scuttle (similar to delicious) but they are not nearly as popular - which is part of the problem.
November 10, 2009 | Unregistered CommenterAllyson Kapin
Thanks for continuing the conversation here!

When I posted about the Causes event last week, I wish I had thought of some of the questions you raise here to add to the others I posed! Especially the "too social media dependent" perspective. The Causes event made me think of the people behind the technologies, the technologies themselves, and then the relationships between that side of things and the end users. As is being discussed in the comments there, it's a difficult line between "going where your community is" and ensuring that you are in a place where you have access to data, relationships, etc.

I appreciate Beth's personal case study, but don't necessarily agree that it would work for an organization, not just an individual. Only capturing "influencers" sounds like a subjective process and one difficult to pass on to others in the organization or to a new employee taking over for the previous staffer in charge. Also, it's been my experience working in nonprofits that it's far more important to be able to track, monitor, and even simply count all of your supporters (whether they are donors, volunteers, advocates or anything else), than to only mention the influential folks.

Thanks so much for the post and continuing to discuss the issues!

(post at: http://www.amysampleward.org/2009/11/06/new-on-ssir-letting-technology-lead/)
November 11, 2009 | Unregistered CommenterAmy Sample Ward
Great article. In the Phoenix region, I recently learned that the last regional newspaper in the area captures 25% of people ages 25-35 on their news Web site, while reaching close to 75% of the population when you combine the daily print with the online. While people are quick to write news outlets off, I'd like to see any social network have that kind of reach.

The key is to find a balance by using channels suited to you donor profiles, as you have indicated. My experience is that high-end donors, for example, are not highly-engaged online. Go where your donors go.

There are several ways to capture email sign-up from Social Networks and these can be customized as a means of collecting data. Facebook, for example, has a widget. I'm certain this could be locked into other networks, including MySpace. I have used this widget in conjunction with forms created in Exact Target and the data can easily be exported for use in a CRM tool such as MS-CRM. From time to time, it's necessary to cross-reference your fans/members with the CRM data, but with a little disciplin, it can be accomplished.
November 11, 2009 | Unregistered CommenterChris Rogers
Chris - can you share the widgets you referenced for capturing contact info (email, name, etc) on Facebook? I know of one vendor who created an app that lets nonprofits send out action alerts via Facebook which then allows orgs to capture all of a user’s contact info once they opt in. There was another widget that scrubbed data on FB but FB banned it because it violated their privacy policy.

Regarding high dollar donors. It's important that nonprofit's engage all levels of donors - small dollar donors who are committed to nonprofit's missions and donate repeatedly are just as important as high dollar donors. Also, small dollar donors can be moved up the chain to eventually donate more.
November 11, 2009 | Unregistered CommenterAllyson Kapin

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
All HTML will be escaped. Hyperlinks will be created for URLs automatically.