Tuesday
24Jul2007
Is It Worth It? An ROI Calculator for Social Network Campaigns
Tuesday, July 24, 2007 at 09:10AM | by
Justin Perkins
Wonder if you should spend your time campaigning in social networks?You can use this tool to calculate an estimate of cost and return on investment for the recruitment and fundraising efforts of your staff in social networking sites like Facebook or MySpace. It works sort of like an online mortgage calculator. Just enter the starting assumptions in the yellow boxes below and the tool calculates results automatically.
Need some metrics guidelines? You might check out some of the online advocacy and fundraising benchmark studies. If you don't measure results strictly by fundraising -- maybe your results are based on advocacy or branding only -- you can just look at the "cost per friend" or "cost per email name" to compare with the costs of recruiting people elsewhere. You can also see how that translates into cost per action or email viewed (opened).
If you would like to see the assumptions and equations behind the magical calculations, they are available on the original Excel spreadsheet. Email Justin Perkins to request a copy or to send feedback, and feel free to comment below.
You might also consider other factors that aren't measured here:
- Opportunity cost: what else could I have my staff or volunteers doing if they weren't spending time in social networks?
- Viral benefit of social networks: if you have a network in place, you might increase your chances of reaching a lot of people during a crisis. Some social networks are set up to enable communications with a lot of people quickly.
- Demographics: is the audience you're recruiting from the social network appropriate for your organization?
- Message control: your message is likely to get picked up by others, and to be successful, some amount of message control will likely need to be sacrificed.
- Investing in the future: Maybe the younger demographic of the social networks will be interested in your organization in the future, so it may not be a bad idea to start building awareness now.
Receive monthly updates





Reader Comments (23)
From talking about this last week, the biggest question this has stuck with me is how relevant ROI is for judging the value of a tactic that might serve goals other than fundraising.
Is it irresponsible of me to spend ANY staff time on social networks? These calculations say it is, but strategic interests that aren't meausured in dollars raised pull in a different direction.
So I'm really curious about how many folks in this field are measured on goals other than raising money. Thoughts?
I think this ROI calculator is a great means for getting down to the brass tacks of $$$-value that social networks generate per person-hour invested in them. Quantitatively, that's worth quite a bit as no one has been able to calculate this metric so thoroughly before. Job well done!
Incidentally, are you able to record the values that users enter in these fields? It might be interesting to find out the average # of staff time invested/friend/donation, and so on.
However, when you go to analyze the cost of acquisition for supporters, it's worth asking the question as to where you'll get the biggest bang for your dollar. Best practices to date indicate that's via email, both in acquisition and in response. Hopefully others will chime in on this point with their own experiences from adventures in social networks.
Jonathon, currently the functionality for capturing every value entered doesn't exist with this tool. I would love to run an anonymous analysis to come up with some benchmarks, so contact me if you're interested.
This is an excellent tool and thank you for sharing it.
Have you done this analysis on other tactics, I'm thinking Internet advertising for one.
I know ROI is important, but you do think the numbers alone can guide the decision. How do you factor in the potential benefit/value of the other strategic issues you mention at the end?
Lots to ponder here. Thanks for sharing this!
Social networks appear to be "free", but if you think about social networks as a microcosm of the broader world wide web (I haven't said that for years), the same rules, for the most part, apply. A lot of it comes down to a numbers game. It takes a lot of work to build a quality audience. It's really not that different from building an email list, except that it's a little easier for information to spread in fun and unexpected ways, and you can choose, more or less, who joins your list.
We saw people using Care2's social network to raise money during Katrina, and if the social network weren't in place, that self-organizing phenomenon couldn't have happened as easily. However, in the day to day, I have only seen a couple of examples of really successful nonprofit campaigns in social networks that have converted to "value" as measured by our current paradigm of what is valuable to nonprofits. I would love to see more success stories -- post 'em here!
I created a formula earlier in the year (see http://www.solidariti.com/article/Doesefforteffect) but it is not as specific as your ROI analysis and requires a fair bit of subjectivity, so is not much good for attracting funders for an online social networking campaign.
On the other hand, if you're not looking for funding, subjectivity might not be such a bad thing ... I agree with Beth that a dollar value alone can't determine whether using online social networking is a worthwhile activity, which is why I've also included time and geek knowledge in my formula. The ROI on the amount of time an online campaigner spends networking with sympathisers to build lasting relationships is not something that can be measured easily, if at all. For instance, you can count the number of MySpace friends your organisation has, but you don't know how many of those "friends" are close supporters of your organisation, how many just made you their friend because they liked one of your blog posts, or how many wanted to simply be seen as associating themselves with your organisation. As an online campaigner you need to engage all these people regularly and in a meaningful way as they are all potentially advocates for your cause. You do this to build the relationship with these people with the belief that some will eventually become campaigners for your organisation and/or your greater cause, which will eventually help you achieve positive social change.
Anyway, sorry to write so much, and thanks again for sharing this useful tool with us, I'll be having a close look at it using our organisation's numbers to assess our organisation's online activities. I look forward to continuing this conversation :)
http://www.solidariti.com/article/Doesefforteffect
As the earlier post said - great first crack at the calculator. Looking forward to sharing your calculator (and the blog) with my clients within the sector. Cheers,
Andy
Please feel free to email me leslie@ppca.org
A = Contribution margin in currency generated from externally referred customers
B = Cost in currency for human interaction and other cost to manage and engage in the ecosystem
C = Social Media ROI
A/B = C
(source Mike Johansson)
http://www.socialmediatoday.com/SMC/77179
However, why make it so complicated? Best to tie things as closely to revenue as possible. What do you think about the idea in this post: http://bit.ly/KCatb ?
How many 3rd party events did you acquire as a result of relationships made via social networks? How many corporate sponsorships were gained as a result of your social media efforts? How many sponsors did you increase contributions from as a result of the added exposure?
How many middle/major gift donors did you identify and/or cultivate as a result of your social networks ability to engage new/previously unidentified supporters?
How many media outlets contacted you and ran stories as a result of your social media efforts? What impact did this exposure have on your awareness and fundraising activities?
This list goes on and on... and your list lacks these and many others. This isn't direct response. Don't measure it in the same way.